Description

The Antwerp Port Authority has a key role in the port's day-to-day operation. The Port Authority manages and maintains the docks, the bridges, the locks, the quay walls and the land. The personnel is also responsible for safe shipping traffic in the docks, the bridges and locks. In addition, the Port Authority provides tugs and cranes, carries out dredging work and promotes the port at home and abroad.

Bounties

Responsible disclosure

Domains

*.c-point.be

No Bounty
URL

*.portofantwerp.com

No Bounty
URL
Out of scope: jobs.portofantwerp.com, media.portofantwerp.com & register.portofantwerp.com

188.118.8.0/25

No Bounty
IP Range

94.107.237.192/26

No Bounty
IP Range
In scope

The use of an intigriti.me address is mandatory at all times!

We are happy to announce our first program! We've done our best to clean most of our known issues and now would like to request your help to spot the once we missed! We are specifically looking for

  • leaking of personal data
  • horizontal / vertical privilege escalation
  • SQLi
  • ...

IMPORTANT:
Some websites partially share the same codebase and can contain common issues. If a specific issue has already been found in another Port of Antwerp website it will be treated as a duplicate.

Out of scope

Out of scope DOMAINS

  • jobs.portofantwerp.com
  • media.portofantwerp.com
  • register.portofantwerp.com (NOTE: register-accpt.portofantwerp.com and register-test.portofantwerp.com are IN scope!)

Out of scope ACTIONS

Doing registrations on our websites without the use of an intigriti.me address

Application

  • Self-XSS that cannot be used to exploit other users
  • Verbose messages/files/directory listings without disclosing any sensitive information
  • CORS misconfiguration on non-sensitive endpoints
  • Missing cookie flags
  • Missing security headers
  • Cross-site Request Forgery with no or low impact
  • Presence of autocomplete attribute on web forms
  • Reverse tabnabbing
  • Bypassing rate-limits or the non-existence of rate-limits.
  • Best practices violations (password complexity, expiration, re-use, etc.)
  • Clickjacking on pages with no sensitive actions
  • CSV Injection
  • Host Header Injection
  • Sessions not being invalidated (logout, enabling 2FA, ..)
  • Hyperlink injection/takeovers
  • Mixed content type issues
  • Cross-domain referer leakage
  • Anything related to email spoofing, SPF, DMARC or DKIM
  • Content injection
  • Username / email enumeration
  • E-mail bombing
  • HTTP Request smuggling without any proven impact
  • Homograph attacks
  • XMLRPC enabled
  • Banner grabbing / Version disclosure
  • Open ports without an accompanying proof-of-concept demonstrating vulnerability
  • Weak SSL configurations and SSL/TLS scan reports
  • Not stripping metadata of images
  • Disclosing credentials without proven impact
  • Disclosing API keys without proven impact
  • Same-site scripting
  • Subdomain takeover without taken over the subdomain
  • Arbitrary file upload without proof of the existence of the uploaded file

General

  • In case that a reported vulnerability was already known to the company from their own tests, it will be flagged as a duplicate.
  • Theoretical security issues with no realistic exploit scenario(s) or attack surfaces, or issues that would require complex end user interactions to be exploited, may be excluded or be lowered in severity
  • Spam, social engineering and physical intrusion
  • DoS/DDoS attacks or brute force attacks.
  • Vulnerabilities that are limited to non-current browsers (older than 3 versions) will not be accepted
  • Attacks requiring physical access to a victim’s computer/device, man in the middle or compromised user accounts
  • Recently disclosed zero-day vulnerabilities in commercial products where no patch or a recent patch (< 2 weeks) is available. We need time to patch our systems just like everyone else - please give us 2 weeks before reporting these types of issues.
  • Reports that state that software is out of date/vulnerable without a proof-of-concept

Mobile

  • Shared links leaked through the system clipboard
  • Any URIs leaked because a malicious app has permission to view URIs opened
  • The absence of certificate pinning
  • Sensitive data in URLs/request bodies when protected by TLS
  • Lack of obfuscation
  • Path disclosure in the binary
  • Self-XSS that cannot be used to exploit other users
  • Lack of jailbreak & root detection
  • Crashes due to malformed URL Schemes
  • Lack of binary protection (anti-debugging) controls, mobile SSL pinning
  • Snapshot/Pasteboard leakage
  • Runtime hacking exploits (exploits only possible in a jailbroken environment)
  • API key leakage used for insensitive activities/actions
  • Attacks requiring physical access to the victim's device
  • Attacks requiring installing malicious applications onto the victim's device
Rules of engagement

Our promise to you

  • We are happy to respond to any questions, please use the button in the right top corner for this.
  • We respect the safe harbour clause that you can find below

Your promise to us

  • Provide detailed but to-the point reproduction steps
  • Include a clear attack scenario. How will this affect us exactly?
  • Remember: quality over quantity!
  • Please do not discuss or post vulnerabilities without our consent (including PoC's on YouTube and Vimeo)
  • Please do not use automatic scanners -be creative and do it yourself! We cannot accept any submissions found by using automatic scanners. Scanners also won't improve your skills, and can cause a high server load (we'd like to put our time in thanking researchers rather than blocking their IP's 😉)

Safe harbour for researchers

Port of Antwerp considers ethical hacking activities conducted consistent with the Researcher Guidelines, the Program description and restrictions (the Terms) to constitute “authorized” conduct under criminal law. Port of Antwerp will not pursue civil action or initiate a complaint for accidental, good faith violations, nor will they file a complaint for circumventing technological measures used by us to protect the scope as part of your ethical hacking activities.

If legal action is initiated by a third party against you and you have complied with the Terms, Port of Antwerp will take steps to make it known that your actions were conducted in compliance and with our approval.

Severity assessment

All our rewards are impact based, therefore we kindly ask you to carefully evaluate a vulnerability's impact when picking a severity rating. To give you an idea of what kind of bugs belong in a certain severity rating we've put some examples below. Note that depending on the impact a bug can sometimes be given a higher/lower severity rating.

Exceptional

  • RCE (Remote Code Execution)

Critical

  • SQL injection
  • Authentication bypass on critical infrastructure
  • Privilege escalation

High

  • Access to all customer personal data
  • Stored XSS without user interaction

Medium

  • XSS
  • CSRF with a significant impact

Low

  • XSS that requires lots of user interaction ( > 3 steps)
  • CSRF with a very limited impact

Port of Antwerp is following intigriti's standard view on severity assessment and impact analysis. More information can be found on:
http://kb.intigriti.com/en/articles/3672302-severity-assessment

FAQ

Where can we get credentials for the app?

We currently don’t offer any credentials to test user roles.

All aboard!
Please log in or sign up on the platform

For obvious reasons we can only allow submissions or applications for our program with a valid intigriti account.

It will only take 2 minutes to create a new one or even less to log in with an existing account, so don't hesitate and let's get started. We would be thrilled to have you as part of our community.

Program specifics
ID check required
Reputation points
Triage
Last 90 day response times
avg. days first response
0.97
avg. days to decide
22.48
avg. days to triage
3.51
Activity
10/22
Port of Antwerp
closed a submission
10/21
logo
monster
created a submission
10/21
Port of Antwerp
closed a submission
10/20
Port of Antwerp
changed the out of scope
10/15
Port of Antwerp
accepted a submission
10/15
Port of Antwerp
closed a submission
10/15
Port of Antwerp
closed a submission
10/15
Port of Antwerp
closed a submission
10/14
logo
0_1vitthals
created a submission
10/14
logo
0_1vitthals
created a submission